Medical research into women’s health? Nah. Scientifically determining who’s the hottest chick? Fuck yes!

An article came up on my Facebook feed stating that according to scientific research, Kelly Brooke has the perfect female body. She’s someone from the UK and her body fits the mathematical proportions perfectly according to their research. When I saw this, I seethed. Not because I don’t agree that she’s beautiful, but because while research into women’s health is lagging behind like crazy, someone apparently gave some scientists money to check women out and decide who is the hottest, according to math. (If math can go to waste, this is it).

First of all, why do we need this research? What value does this add to our society? Does it tell us anything about our world? Our unieverse? Medically does it have any merit? Some bullshit is spewed about how it’s about how a certain ratio of curves means a woman is more fertile or some shit, and sure, let’s just agree. So the fuck what? Why do we need the exact centimeters? All you’re doing is trying to pit women against each other some more in some competitive “this is the ultimate woman” bullshit the way society has been doing for centuries, that does not ring true in the real world at all. I think we’re all smart enough to recognize a woman’s fertility isn’t THE DEFINING FUCKING CHARACTERISTIC OF HER VALUE TO SOCIETY or even to a partner, nor are a few centimeters more or less here or there the difference between having children or not, or having “better children” or not.

Secondly, and this is the part that really gets me, this research is getting done while actual women’s health research isn’t. Gender specific research is lagging behind. Even in the first stages, more male animals are used as test subjects than female ones. This whole men are the default gender bullshit is actually showing and it is hurting women by putting limits on our understanding of our bodies. This affects how much we know about disease. How much we know about the different ways medicine can affect us, which could potentially be the difference between the medicine working or not. About hereditary conditions. Even sexual health.

Some people still dispute that the G-spot exists. They also argue that women have lower sex drives, in at least one case driven by the methodology of going around a campus and asking people for sex. Men were more likely to say yes. Shocking. Did you consider maybe societal pressures? Did you consider safety considerations, as women were maybe more likely to be scared of  being alone in a confined place with a stranger bigger than them? There’s other kinds of research on this, but with methodologies like this one, you can’t trust the results.

Also, yes, how horny women are is the question science is starting to try and answer, comparatively more than other gender specific matters it seems. Gee I wonder whether it is women making these decisions about which research gets done and which questions we want the answers to first and foremost.

So, while I know so little about my sexual organs and how my gender affects me medically otherwise, I now know who the hottest woman in the world is. Thank you science. Fuck you whoever funded and conducted that. I hope since then you’ve actually contributed something to the world. Or at least that you did the male equivalent study. 

Making talking obsolete? Tesla’s Neurolink

The very interesting and terrifying Neurolink is a true mystery to me. Not so much because of the technology, since how scientists do what they do is always a mystery to me, but because why? I mean, yeah, pursuit of knowledge for the sake of the pursuit of knowledge,  much like art. And I’m sure communicating without speaking or writing could be very helpful for people who can’t do so verbally, for whatever reason. But in general, do *I*, the average Earthling trying to live a happy life on a day to day basis, need the technology to communicate with only my mind? I mean, does this mean people could one day hack into our brains? Is that a stupid question? I can never tell.

I take great pleasure in writing actually, even speaking sometimes. I am really not looking for ways to do less of that. In fact, I find that the technology that already exists affects me negatively in taking away too much communication by being digital. Well, safe to say I am not these guys’ target audience.

Still, I find the whole thing fascinating so here’s a link from the article I read about this mind-boggling technology. I think they did a great job of presenting all sorts of arguments and angles on it, so do tell me what you think! 🙂

From the Scientific American, “Neuralink wants to wire your brain to the internet — What could possibly go wrong?” :
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/neuralink-wants-to-wire-your-brain-to-the-internet-what-could-possibly-go-wrong/

 

Godzy